Writ petition filed under Article 226 sought mandamus for police protection to participate in temple ceremonies. Petitioner failed to appear after notice, resulting in dismissal for default.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.318 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
WP(MD)No.318 of 2021
Kamaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.
4.The Tahsildar, Turaiyur Taluk, Trichy District.
5.The Inspector of Police, Jambunathapuram Police Station, Trichy District.
6.M.Govindan ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate steps against the sixth respondent and his henchman and to give adequate protection to the petitioner and his family to participate in pooja and other ceremonies in Arulmigu Thotticiamman Temple at Thulaiyanatham, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.
For Petitioner :Mr.R.Manoharan For Respondents 1 to 5 :Mr.R.Saravanakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Mr.K.Arunraj (for R6)
1/2
WP(MD)No.318 of 2021
When the Writ Petition came up for hearing on 11.01.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, i.e., 17.02.2021, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy //
rmk
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.
4.The Tahsildar, Turaiyur Taluk, Trichy District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Jambunathapuram Police Station, Trichy District. WP(MD)No.318 of 2021 17.02.2021
ES(CO)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ KK(09.03.2021) 2P 6C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamaraj
M. Govindan
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
