The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC praying against police harassment, as the Government Advocate submitted no complaint existed against the petitioner.
The petitioner's bail against police harassment protection was denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2473 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.02.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2473 of 2021
Jeyanthi
... Petitioner
Vs.
3.B.Chandrasekar ... Respondents
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of an enquiry.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Erottuchamy, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
ORDER
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner.
2.Mr.R.Erottuchamy, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that no complaint has been received by the second respondent police from the third respondent, against the petitioner so far.
3.Recording the said submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
// True Copy //
/ /2021
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2473 of 2021
| rm | |
|---|---|
| No | te In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. |
| To | |
| 1. |
The Superintendent of Police Trichy District, Trichy. |
| 2. |
The Inspector of Police Thuvakudi Police Station Trichy District. |
| 3. |
The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2473 of 2021 |
| 17.02.2021 | |
| VB | (09.03.2021) 2P 4C |
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition for protection from police harassment should be dismissed given the lack of a complaint.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeyanthi
Superintendent of Police Trichy District Trichy
Inspector of Police Thuvakudi Police Station Trichy District
B Chandrasekar
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
