light of the fair submission made by learned counsel for writ petitioner, it is not necessary to dilate much on facts. Suffice to say that at the time of filing of writ petition, writ petitioner was serving as Animal Husbandry Assistant and Government Order being G.O.Ms.No.181 dated 07.11.2007 was issued inter alia pertaining to Live Stock Inspector training for the year 2008-2009. In this Government Order, ten years of service after completion of training was made as a requirement vide Serial No.5 in paragraph 4(a) of the Government Order. Writ petition was filed assailing this provision. Rule Nisi was issued, pending writ petition, this Court made an interim order on 22.12.2008 in MP.No.2008. Pursuant to this interim order, learned counsel for writ petitioner on instructions, submits that writ petitioner was sent for Live Stock Inspector training for the year 2008-2009, he has also thereafter completed his service and retired from service. In effect, purpose of writ petition has been served and nothing really survives for pursuing the matter any further is learned counsel's say.