Dismissed

Tmt.P.Dhanalakshmi v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC4 Aug 2021WMP/19398/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a writ miscellaneous petition filed by the legal heirs of the original petitioner, holding that the matter is now governed by a new Government Order dated 12.09.2018. The court directed the Registry to amend the file and dispose of the main petition separately.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; Registry to amend file and dispose of main writ petition separately.

Tmt.P.Dhanalakshmi Vs The Secretary to… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.M.P.No.19398 of 2019 in W.P.No.29490 of 2008

¶2

W.M.P.No.19398 of 2019 in

¶3

W.P.No.29490 of 2008

¶4

M.SUNDAR.J.,

¶5

Mr.M.Vignesh Raj, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.C.Selvaraj,

¶6

learned State counsel for all the four respondents are before this Virtual Court.

¶7

Main writ petition has been filed assailing an 'order dated 31.03.2008 bearing reference x/K/vz; 22158-Mh;-,2-08 made by the second respondent ' (hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of convenience) wherein the period of part-time service of the writ petitioner i.e., part time Vocational Instructor from 30.06.1979 to 04.10.1996, has not been taken into account for pensionary benefits. The main writ petition was admitted by this Court on 15.12.2008. Pending writ petition, writ petitioner K.C.Balasubramaniam died

¶8

and this Court is informed that his date of demise is 08.04.2012. This Court is informed that his legal heirs i.e, his wife, two sons and three daughters are to be substituted in place of the writ petitioner as family pension is being availed.

¶9

This Court having perused the affidavit filed in support of captioned

¶10

WMP, having heard learned counsel for petitioners and having noticed that State counsel submits that this is a matter which is now governed by G.O (Ms) No.194 dated 12.09.2018, this Court is of the view that prayer in the captioned

¶11

M.SUNDAR.J.,

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶13

W.M.P.No.19398 of 2019 in W.P.No.29490 of 2008

¶14

gpa

¶15

writ miscellaneous petition (WMP) is not only innocuous, but imperative for carrying the writ petition to its logical end. Therefore, captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for.

¶16

To be noted, by a separate order, the main writ petition is being
disposed of today and Registry is directed to carry out necessary and
consequential amendments in the case file before issuing order copy in
captioned WMP as well as writ petition.
Captioned WMP disposed of / ordered with aforementioned directive.
There shall be no order as to costs.
04.08.2021
gpa
W.M.P.No.19398 of 2019 in
W.P.No.29490 of 2008

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Tmt.P.Dhanalakshmi v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt.P.Dhanalakshmi v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Ramanathan Vs the Government of Pondicherry

S. Liakathalikhan Vs State of Tamilnadu

Dr.S.Chitra Vs the State of Tamilnadu

K.C. Balasubramanian (Deceased) Vs the Secretary to Government

J.Vijayal Vs the State of Tamilnadu

P. Krishnamoorthy Vs the State of Tamilnadu