In a single line order, the High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a direction to issue a new electricity connection on the ground that the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.NO.29306 OF 2017
Estar Arulmani
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
(R2 impleded as per the order of this Court dated 26.02.2018 made in W.M.P.No.34633 of 2017)
PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent, the Assistant Engineer, Anakapathur to issue New Electricity connection for Door No.9, Mariyan Street, Kamarajapuram, Anakapathur, Chennai 6000 070 in the name of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Chelladurai Caldwell For R1 : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh Standing Counsel For R2 : No appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in this writ petition has already became infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pns
To
The Assistant Engineer, Anakapathur, TNEB, Lakshmi Narayana Nagar, Pammal, Chennai – 600 075.
+1cc to M/s.J.Chelladurai Caldwell, Advocate, S.R.No.60317
W.P.No.29306 of 2017
KSM(CO) RLP(13/12/2021)
Estar Arulmani
The Assistant Engineer, Anakapathur, TNEB
T.Solomon
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
