C. Madhan v. Syndicate Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ directing bank to return title documents and contributed amount regarding his wife's property. Court disposed petition as infructuous as the cause for filing no longer exists.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.NO.25883 OF 2011
C.Madhan
.. Petitioner
..Vs..
- Syndicate Bank, Rep. by its Manager, No.3, Panagal Street, Tiruvallur – 602 001.
- Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing & Development Corporation Ltd., 2nd Street, Judges Colony, Periyakuppam, Thiruvallur District.
.. Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent, Syndicate Bank, Thiruvallur to return the originals documents of title relating to his wife property being Plot No.71 comprised in Survey No.185 in Selai Village, Thiruvallur Taluk along with the amount contributed by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Madhan
- respondent
Syndicate Bank, Rep. by its Manager, No.3, Panagal Street, Tiruvallur
- respondent
Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing & Development Corporation Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court