The writ petition seeking directions to restore electricity connections was disposed of as infructuous because the cause for filing had vanished upon the petitioners' submission, without further adjudication on the merits of the dispute.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.NO. 13678 OF 2013 AND M.P.NOS.1 AND 2 OF 2013
...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to issue necessary directions to the third respondent to restore the electricity service connection to the petitioners respective residential houses and consequently direct the third respondent to restore the electricity service connection to the petitioners respective houses at Suramangalam Main Road, South Row, Pallapatti, Salem – 636 009.
For Petitioners : Mr.L.Povendra Perumal For M/s.Sai Associates
For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [For R1 and R2]
Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners made a submission that the cause aroused for filing of the present writ petition became vanished. Thus, no further adjudication is required.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nti/jeni
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.60052
W.P.No. 13678 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013
PMK(CO) RLP(06/12/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Ponnusamy and others
The District Collector, Salem District
The Tahsildar, Salem District
The Assistant Engineer, TNEB
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
