High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition seeking quashment of a housing allotment notification and direction for possession delivery, citing the petitioner's non-prosecution due to change of vakalat.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.11.2021
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.No.13190 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.15527 & 15528 of 2018
D.Maheswari
...Petitioner
Vs
Prayer Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notification published in Daily Thanthi dated 27.05.2018 issued by the third respondent in so far as house No.HIG Old No.14, New No.316-H situated at A.Jettihalli Housing Unit, Dharmapuri concerned and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to handover the possession of the house in so far as house No.No.HIG Old No.14, New No.316-H situated at A.Jettihalli Housing Unit, Dharmapuri by issuing final allotment order.
For Petitioner : No Apperance For R1 : Mr.V.Nanmaran Additional Government Pleader
For R2 & R3 : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar Standing Counsel
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notification published in Daily Thanthi dated 27.05.2018 issued by the third respondent in so far as house No.HIG Old No.14, New No.316-H situated at A.Jettihalli Housing Unit, Dharmapuri concerned and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to handover the possession of the house in so far as house No.No.HIG Old No.14, New No.316-H situated at A.Jettihalli Housing Unit, Dharmapuri by issuing final allotment order.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.K.Munuswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has already given change of vakalat for the petitioner and there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through any other counsel.
3.Thelearned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the petitioner did not pay a single pie to the third respondent for the allotment of flat, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for the allotment of flat and that may be the reason why the petitioner's counsel has given change of vakalat. Hence, prayed to dismiss the Writ Petition.
4.Though the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the petitioner is not entitled for the allotment of flat for non-payment of any amount, since there is no representation for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rst
To:
+1cc to M/s.J.Selvarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.61280 +1cc to M/s.R.Bharathkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.61237 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.61485
W.P.No.13190 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.15527 & 15528 of 2018
KSM(CO) RGA(09/12/2021)
D.Maheswari
State of Tamil Nadu
Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board
Executive Engineer cum Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
