Appellants filed a writ appeal challenging an order in a promotion petition. Since appellants had complied with the earlier order via a Government Order, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
Writ Appeal dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 03.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MR. J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.A.No.742 of 2017 and C.M.P.No. 10195 of 2017
... Appellants v. D. Rajan ... Respondent
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order made in W.P.No.20676 of 2016, dated 04.08.2016.
Prayer in W.P.No.20676 of 2016:-
Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the appropriate place in the panel drawn for the year 2016-2017 for promotion to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector (Non-Technical) and to promote him to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector (Non-Technical) not-withstanding the order dated 05.02.2016 of the first respondent imposing punishment of stoppage of increment for three years with cumulative effect in the petitioner, within a time to be specified by this Court.
For Respondent : Mr. D. Ganesan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
When the Writ Appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr. R.U. Dinesh Rajkumar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants and Mr. D. Ganesan learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the appellants have complied with the orders of the learned Single Judge, which is impugned in the Writ Appeal, by passing an Government Order on 04.06.2020, hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Appeal.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj
To:
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.63823
W.A.No.742 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.10195 of 2017
RSV(CO) SU(15/12/2021)
The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai
The Joint Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai
The Regional Transport Oficer, Redhills, Nallur Village, Chennai
D. Rajan
M. Duraishwamy
J. Sathya Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
