Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court dismissed Transfer C.M.P. No.21623 of 1999 under Rule 8(2) of the Hon'ble Supreme Court Rules (or equivalent default provision) due to the petitioner's consistent non-appearance at listed hearings.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for default.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Tr.C.M.P.No.21623 of 1999
V.M.VELUMANI,J.
This Transfer CMP is of the year 1999. Registry is not able to trace the EB and other relevant papers and hence, this matter is listed under the caption 'For want of E.B. cases [without EB cases]'. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.11.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Subsequently, the matter was directed to be posted on 23.11.2021. On 23.11.2021, when the matter was taken up for hearing, again there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today i.e., 25.11.2021 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
25.11.2021
vkr
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unknown Petitioner
Coram
VELUMANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court