Dismissed
Vs
Madras HCTR CMP/18276/1992
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition filed under Tr.C.M.P.No.18276 of 1992 was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear before the court on three listed hearing dates.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for default without costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Petition dismissed for default without costs.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Tr.C.M.P.No.18276 of 1992
¶2
V.M.VELUMANI,J.
¶3
This Transfer CMP is of the year
¶4
- Registry is not able to trace the EB and other relevant papers and hence, this matter is listed under the caption 'For want of E.B. cases [without EB cases]'. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.11.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Subsequently, the matter was directed to be posted on 23.11.2021. On 23.11.2021, when the matter was taken up for hearing, again there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today i.e., 25.11.2021 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
¶5
25.11.2021
¶6
vkr
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
V.M.VELUMANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court