Kalyani Naicker v. Saravana Naicker
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of petitioner despite multiple hearings and directions to post under 'for dismissal' caption.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Tr.C.M.P.No.19636 of 2001
V.M.VELUMANI,J.
This Transfer CMP is of the year 2001. Registry is not able to trace the EB and other relevant papers and hence, this matter is listed under the caption 'For want of E.B. cases [without EB cases]'. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.11.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Subsequently, the matter was directed to be posted on 23.11.2021. On 23.11.2021, when the matter was taken up for hearing, again there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today i.e., 25.11.2021 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
vkr
25.11.2021
Petitioner
Cornor
V.M. VELUMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court