Dismissed
Pandeeswari v. L.Vijayakumar
Madras HCCMP/13653/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in Tr.C.M.P.No.45 of 2015 C.M.P.No.13653 of…
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed for default due to absence of the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.M.P.No.13653 of 2018 in Tr.C.M.P.No.45 of 2015
¶2
C.M.P.No.13653 of 2018 in Tr.C.M.P.No.45 of 2015
¶3
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
¶4
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.11.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for default.
¶5
24.11.2021
¶6
krk
¶8
1/1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
V.M.VELUMANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court