G.Gopal v. G.C.Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed second appeals for non-prosecution as the legal representatives of the deceased appellant had not been brought on record before the hearing date, in accordance with a prior order.
What did the court decide?
Second appeals S.A.Nos.1619 & 1620 of 2002 and C.M.P.No.13778 of 2002 dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.Nos.1619 & 1620 of 2002 and C.M.P.No.13778 of 2002
G. Gopal ...Appellant in both the second appeals/Appellant /2nd Defendant Vs. 1.G.C.Jain ..1st Respondent/1st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Anjaneyalu 3.Venkateswaralu 4.Saibaba 5.Chinnavadu 6.Alamelu Ammal ...Respondents in both the second appeals/ Respondents 2 to 6/Defendants 4 to 8 Common Prayer: These second appeals have been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 03.05.2002 passed in A.S.Nos.4 & 5 of 1995 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Kancheepuram confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.08.1994 passed in O.S.Nos.43 & 57 of 1986 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram respectively.
For Appellant : No appearance in both SA's For Respondent No.1 : Mr.K.M.Balaji in both SA's For Respondent Nos.2 to 6 in both SA's : Not Ready in Notice
COMMON JUDGMENT
This Court, by its earlier order dated 18.06.2021, has made it clear that if steps are not taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased appellant before the next hearing date, these Second Appeals shall stand automatically dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Gopal
- respondent
G.C.Jain
- respondent
Anjaneyalu
- respondent
Venkateswaralu
- respondent
Saibaba
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court