Partly allowed

Banu,W/O.Sekar v. Mtc., Ltd., Chennai 600 002

Madras HC15 Jul 2021CMA/2483/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil miscellaneous appeal against an award dated 11.11.2013, the Court enhanced the claimant's compensation for a motor accident. The Court raised the notional monthly income from Rs.5,000 to Rs.8,000, added 40% compensation for loss of future prospects, and corrected the loss of earning power calculation from Rs.4,50,000 to Rs.10,08,000, increasing the total award to Rs.17,31,000.

What did the court decide?

Enhanced loss of earning power to Rs.10,08,000/-; increased total compensation award from Rs.11,73,000 to Rs.17,31,000 with interest at 7.5% p.a.; directed deposition amount.

Banu,W/O.Sekar Vs Mtc., Ltd., Chennai 600 002 — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.07.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶5

C.M.A.No.2483 of 2015

¶6

Banu ... Appellant/Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶9

... Respondent/Respondent

¶10

PRAYER:-

¶11

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgment and decree dated 11.11.2013 and made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.4085 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (In the Court of III Small Causes), Chennai.

¶12

For Appellant : Mr.F.Terry Chella Raja For Respondent : Mr.K.Moorthy

¶13

JUDGMENT

¶14

(Heard Video Conference)

¶15

This appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 11.11.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, III Judge Small Causes Court, Chennai in MACTOP No.4085 of 2012.

¶16

The appellant/claimant unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award are as follows :

¶19

Heads	Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.)
Loss of income	60000
Transport to hospital	20000
Extra nourishment	25000
Damage to clothing	3000
Medical expenses	425000
Future medical expenses	75000
Attender charges	15000
Loss of amenities	25000
Pain and sufferings	75000
Loss of earning power	450000
Total	1173000

¶20

Heard Mr.F.Terry Chella Raja, learned counsel for the appellant/claimant and Mr.K.Moorthy, learned counsel for the respondent/Transport Corporation.

¶21

This Court has perused and examined the impugned award before the Tribunal.

¶22

The appellant/claimant was aged 34 years and was a Tailor at the time of the accident. The age and avocation of the appellant/claimant has not been disputed by the respondent before the Tribunal. The accident happened on 08.08.2012.

¶23

The appellant/claimant has sustained the following injuries as a result of an accident :

¶24

a) Chest injury

¶25

b) Fracture left clavicle

¶26

c) Fracture 1^st and 2^nd ribs left side

¶27

d) Fracture of 1^st - 9^th ribs right side and bilateral hemopneumothorax

¶28

e) Fracture of left superior and inferior public rami

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

f) Fracture L2 to L4 vertebra and sacral fracture S1 to S3 left side and liver contusion and moderate hemoperitoneum.

¶31

She was hospitalised between the period 8.8.2012 to 26.8.2012 at Parvathy hospital. During her period of treatment, wound wash was given and pelvic external fixation application was done on her on 8.8.2012. Bilateral ICD was also applied. Wound debridement and VAC application was also done on 11.08.2012 and Open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis at left clavicle was also done on her on 14.08.2012. Split skin grafting at right gluteal region was also done on her on 16.08.2012 and external fixation at the pelvic region was removed on 20.08.2012.

¶32

Before the Tribunal, the appellant/claimant has filed 16 documents which were marked as Exs.P1 to P16, which included the discharge summary issued by the hospital, continuous treatment record, CT Scan reports, USB reports, medical bills, hospital bills and the disability certificate issued by Dr.Saravana Bhavanantham, who also examined as a witness before the Tribunal as PW2. The photographs of the appellant/claimant after the accident was also examined as Ex.P13 before the Tribunal. As seen from the photographs, the injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant is a gruesome one. On the face of it, it reveals that the appellant/claimant will not be in a position to work as a Tailor in the near future due to the grievous injuries sustained by her, as indicated supra.

¶33

The Tribunal has fixed the notional monthly income of the appellant/claimant at Rs.5,000/-. This Court is of the considered view that if the Tribunal has given due consideration to the year of the accident and the avocation of the appellant/ claimant, it ought to have fixed the notional monthly income at a higher sum. This Court after giving due consideration to the avocation and the year of the accident fixes the notional monthly income of the appellant/claimant at Rs.8,000/- instead of 5,000/- fixed by the Tribunal.

¶34

The Tribunal has erroneously not awarded any compensation towards future prospects to the appellant/claimant despite the fact as seen from the evidence available on record, she will be not in a position to do her regular work as a Tailor in the future. Therefore, this Court awards compensation towards loss of future prospects to the appellant/claimant at 40%.

¶35

Though the Tribunal assessed the whole body disability of the appellant/claimant at 50% and calculated the loss of earning power at the same percentage, whereas due to a typographical error, the same was reflected under the impugned award as 30% before the Tribunal. Accordingly, this Court

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

confirms the whole body disability of the appellant/claimant at 50%, as assessed by the Tribunal.

¶38

Accordingly, the loss of earning power of the appellant/ claimant is enhanced to Rs.10,08,000/- (Rs.8,000/- + 40% = Rs.11,200/- x 12 x 15 x 50%) by this Court instead of Rs.4,50,000/- as fixed by this Tribunal.

¶39

With regard to the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under various other heads namely loss of income, transportation, extra nourishment, damage to clothing, medical expenses, future medical expenses, attender charges, loss of amenities and pain and suffering are concerned, the same is a just compensation and does not call for any interference by this Court.

¶40

Excepting for enhancing the compensation towards loss of earning power from Rs.4,50,000/- to Rs.10,08,000/- the compensation, awarded by the Tribunal under other various heads are confirmed by this Court.

¶41

For the foregoing reasons, the award of the Tribunal is hereby enhanced in the following manner :

¶42

Heads	Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.)	Amount awarded by this Court (Rs.)
Loss of income	60000	60000
Transport to hospital	20000	20000
Extra nourishment	25000	25000
Damage to clothing	3000	3000
Medical expenses	425000	425000
Future medical expenses	75000	75000
Attender charges	15000	15000
Loss of amenities	25000	25000
Pain and sufferings	75000	75000
Loss of earning power
* Rs.5,000/- x 12 x 15 x 50%	450000	1008000
# Rs.8,000/- + 40% =	*	#
Rs.11,200/- x 12 x 15 x 50%
Total	1173000	1731000

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶44

In the result, the appeal filed by the appellant/ claimant, stands partly allowed by enhancing the compensation from Rs.11,73,000/- to Rs.17,31,000/-, as indicated above. No costs.

¶45

The respondent/Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount as assessed by this Court together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of realization, less the amount, if any, already deposited to the credit of M.A.C.T.O.P.No.4085 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Court of Small Causes), Chennai. within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal is directed to transfer the award amount directly to the bank account of the appellant/claimant through RTGS, within a period of two weeks thereafter. Necessary Court fee, if any has to be paid by the appellant/ claimant before receiving the copy of this Judgment.

¶46

Sd/-

¶47

Assistant Registrar(T & P)

¶48

//True Copy//

¶49

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶50

vsi2

¶51

¶52

The Judge, III Court of Small Causes, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.

¶53

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai – 104.

¶54

+1cc to M/s.M.Malar, Advocate, S.R.No.33606

¶55

+1cc to Mr.K.Moorthy, Advocate, S.R.No.33565

¶56

C.M.A.NO.2483 OF 2015

¶57

SJ(CO) PBS/09/11/2021

¶58

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Banu,W/O.Sekar v. Mtc., Ltd., Chennai 600 002

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banu,W/O.Sekar v. Mtc., Ltd., Chennai 600 002

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Insurnace Company Vs Y.Theivanai

M/S.United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai Vs M.Kannan

Icici Lombard Motor Vs B.Stalin John Manual

D Sasikala(Minor) Vs R.Mahalingam

Ponnusamy Chettiar (Died) Vs Poolaga Chettiar

Masianna Gounder Vs Govindaswamy