Dismissed

Ponnusamy Chettiar (Died) v. Poolaga Chettiar

Madras HC15 Jul 2021SA/859/1995

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution. The court observed that the appellant's counsel repeatedly sought adjournments over a period of more than two decades without having appeared on the last hearing date, indicating no intention to prosecute the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Ponnusamy Chettiar (Died) Vs Poolaga Chettiar — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 15.07.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶5

S.A. No.859 of 1995

¶6

Ponnusamy Chettiar (Died)

¶7

Sasikala

¶8

Jayanthi

¶9

Mohan

¶10

Yesodai

¶11

Jikki

¶12

P. Durairaj 8. T. Kumutha

¶13

Sumathi

¶14

*10. Purushothaman .... Appellants Versus 1. Poolaga Chettiar (Died) 2. Thangarasu Chettiar (Died) 3. Ramasami Chettiar (Died) 4. Panduranga Chettiar (Died) ** 5. Rathinambal 6. Rajamaniammal 7. Mallika 8. Gunasekaran 9. Sampath 10. Vimala ***11. Dhanalakshmiammal 12. Sivakumar 13. Padma 14. Tamilselvi **** 15. Ramanjuam *****16. Saroja 17. Dhandapani 18. Sarala 19. Giri 20. Ashok 21. Bharathi .... Respondents * Appellants 2 to 10 brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole appellant viz., Ponnusamy Chettiar vide order of the Court dated 31.07.2019 made in CMP Nos.447, 449 and 452 of 2012 ..in S.A.No.859 of 1995

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

** RR5 to 10 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st respondent viz., Poologa Chettiar vide order of Court dated 31.07.2019 made in CMP Nos.2580 to 2582 of 2007

¶17

..in S.A.No.859 of 1995

¶18

*** RR 11 to 14 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd respondent viz., Thangarasu Chettiar vide order of Court dated 31.07.2019 made in CMP Nos.705 to 707 of 2010.

¶19

..in S.A.No.859 of 1995

¶20

**** Respondent 15 brought on record as LR of the deceased 3rd respondent viz., Ramasami Reddiar vide order of court, dated 31.07.2019 made in CMP No.708 of 2010.

¶21

..in S.A.No.859 of 1995

¶22

***** RR16 to 21 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 4th respondent

¶23

viz., Panduranga Chettiar vide order of Court dated 31.07.2019 made in CMP Nos.709 to 710 of 2010.

¶24

..in S.A.No.859 of 1995

¶25

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure code, against the judgment and decree in A.S. No.4 of 1993 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Villupuram, dated 14.08.1995 reversing the judgment and decree in O.S. No.689 of 1984 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thirukoilur dated 21.07.1992.

¶26

For Appellants : M/s.A.R. Nixon For Respondents : M/s.V. Raghavachari for R6, 8, 9 to 12 R5, 7, 13 to 21 - Refused

¶27

JUDGMENT

¶28

(Heard video conference)

¶29

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today.

¶30

The learned counsel for the appellants once again seeks a

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

short accommodation. On the last hearing date i.e. on 07.07.2021 there was no representation on the side of the appellants. As seen from the earlier proceedings, the learned counsel for the appellants has been repeatedly seeking adjournments. The Second Appeal is of the year 1995. No further indulgence can be shown to the appellants in view of the repeated adjournments sought . It can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

¶33

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶34

//True Copy//

¶35

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶36

vsi2

¶37

¶38

The Sub-Judge, Villupuram.

¶39

The District Munsif Court, Thirukoilur.

¶40

+1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate, S.R.No.33833

¶41

S.A. No.859 of 1995

¶42

JPL(CO) SU(17/09/2021)

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ponnusamy Chettiar (Died) v. Poolaga Chettiar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ponnusamy Chettiar (Died) v. Poolaga Chettiar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Insurnace Company Vs Y.Theivanai

M/S.United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai Vs M.Kannan

Icici Lombard Motor Vs B.Stalin John Manual

D Sasikala(Minor) Vs R.Mahalingam

Masianna Gounder Vs Govindaswamy

Banu,W/O.Sekar Vs Mtc., Ltd., Chennai 600 002