In a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, the Court found that the matter had been settled out of court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
The second appeal was dismissed as the matter was settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :03.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTIC E T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.NO. 1346 OF 2008
AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2008
K.S. Jambulingam S/o. Subramania Gounder ... Appellant Vs.
S/o. Late Sennimalai Gounder
W/o. Nachiappan
... Respondents
R4 to R6 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased R1 viz., Ramasamy vide order of court dated 29.01.2020 made in CMP No.27311 and 27314/2019 in S.A. No.1346/2008.
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 29.11.2006 made in A.S.No.17/2006 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam, reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2005 made in O.S.No.206/2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For Appellant : Mr. R.T. Doraisamy For Respondents: Ms. R. Meenal
JUDGMENT
Both counsel present.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bga
To
+1cc to M/S.R.Meenal, Advocate, S.R.No.13413
S.A.No. 1346 of 2008
MGR(CO)
PM/16/09/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be dismissed in view of the settlement out of court.
K.S. Jambulingam
Ramasamy
Lakshmanan
Venkittammal
Maragatham
Indhirani
E T Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
