Saminathan v. Arumugham
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed by Saminathan was called twice. The appellant failed to appear or provide representation on the second listing. The court dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution with costs.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E T. RAVINDRAN
S.A.No. 858 of 2009
and
M.P.No.1 of 2009
Saminathan S/o. Attukkaran @ Chinnapaiyan ... Appellant Vs. 1. Arumugham S/o. Muthu 2. Natesan S/o. Attukkaran @ Chinnappian 3. Subramanian S/o. Attukkaran @ Chinnappiyan ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2006 passed in A.S.No.09/2005 on the file of the Sub Ordinate Judge, Gingee, reversing the judgment and decree dated 07.11.1991 passed in O.S.No.407 of 1988 on the file of the District Munsif, Gingee.
For Appellant : No appearance. For Respondents For R1 : Ms. P. Bhuvaneshwari
R2 and R3 : given up.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal ought to be dismissed for non-prosecution by the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Saminathan
- respondent
Arumugham
- respondent
Natesan
- respondent
Subramanian
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court