Kaveri v. v.Kandasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant with the court's permission, resulting in the closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E T. RAVINDRAN
S.A.No. 546 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
- Kaveri, S/o. Arumugam
- Veerappan, S/o. Arumugam
- Perumal @ Silamban, S/o. Arumugam ... Appellants
Vs. 1. V. Kandasamy S/o. Veerappan 2. V. Lakshmanan S/o. Veerappan 3. M. Manickam S/o. Late Marimuthu ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 30.01.2012 made in A.S.No.24 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2010 made in O.S.No.1415 of 2007 on the file of the court of the II Additional District Munsif, Salem.
For Appellants : Mr. T. Dhanasekaran For Respondents: Mr. P. Jagadeesan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kaveri, Veerappan, Perumal @ Silamban
- respondent
V. Kandasamy, V. Lakshmanan, M. Manickam
Coram
E T. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court