Second Appeal dismissed as abated because the sole appellant had died long back without listing the legal representatives on record to prosecute the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.03.2021 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1112 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009
Rajamani @ Thailammal,
W/o, Rethinasamy Chettiar,
44, French Teacher Street,
Karaikal Town. ... Appellant
Vs.
1. Subathra,
W/o, Ashok,
Thiruvallur Road,
Karaikal Town.
2. Ashok,
S/o, Ramadass,
Thirunallar Road,
Karaikal. ... Respondents
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 22.08.2005 made in A.S.No.44 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2004 made in O.S.No.92 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Munsif, Karaikal.
Both counsel present.
since no steps had been taken for the deceased appellant, the appeal may be dismissed as abated and also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mfa
To
1. The Additional District Judge,
Additional District Court,
Pondicherry at Karaikal.
2. The Principal District Munsif,
Principal District Munsif Court,
Karaikal.
Copy to
The Section Officer,
VR Section,
High Court,
Chennai.
+1cc to Ms.G.Sumitra, Advocate, S.R.No.13047.
S.A.No.1112 of 2009
and
M.P.No.1 of 2009
VSN II(CO)
CSR 18.03.2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajamani @ Thailammal
Subathra
Ashok
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
