Allowed

Jagtar Singh Jandu, S/o.a.Labh Singh, v. M/s.Rishabh Infopark Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC3 Mar 2021OP/59/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras appointed Mr. Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar (Rtd.) as an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve the dispute, setting a timeline of six months while leaving the respondent free to raise objections to contract validity.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar as Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.

Jagtar Singh Jandu, S/o.a.Labh Singh, Vs M/s.Rishabh Infopark… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

O.P.No.59 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.03.2021

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶6

O.P.No.59 of 2021
Jagtar Singh Jandu ...Petitioner
-V-
M/s.Rishabh Infopark Private Limited,
R.R. Tower IV,
Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate,
Gundy,
Chennai – 600 032. ...Respondent

¶7

Prayer : Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute that had arisen between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.K. Sugumaran for Mr.S. Patrick For Respondent : Mr.P.H. Aravind Pandian, Senior Counsel for M/s.Cibi Vishnu

¶9

1/4

¶10

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶11

O.P.No.59 of 2021

¶12

ORDER

¶13

After arguing the matter, the learned counsels have agreed for the

¶14

arbitrator to be appointed to resolve the dispute between the two.

¶15

2.In the light of the above circumstances this Court is passing the

¶16

following order:

¶17

i)The Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar retired Chief Justice of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court, residing at ‘ ASHIRVADH ’ No.24A, II Street, Kamaraj Avenue, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020, E-mail ID: [email protected], (M) - 94443 90958, is appointed as an Arbitrator.

¶18

ii) The arbitrator may, after issuing notice to the parties and upon

¶19

hearing them, pass an award as expeditiously as possible, preferably within

¶20

a period of six months from the date of receipt of the order. It is open to the respondent to raise all legal objections as to the validity of contract.

¶21

2/4

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶23

O.P.No.59 of 2021

¶24

iii) The arbitrator is at liberty to fix the remuneration and other

¶25

incidental expenses as per law.

¶26

iv) The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the

¶27

Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras
High Court Arbitration Rules.
3. The application is, accordingly, closed, leaving the parties to bear
their own costs.
03.03.2021
Internet : Yes/No
Index :Yes/No
Speaking / Non-Speaking
mps
To
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar (Rtd.,)
Chief Justice of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court,
‘ASHIRVADH’ No.24A, II Street,
Kamaraj Avenue,
Adyar,
Chennai – 600 020.

¶28

3/4

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

O.P.No.59 of 2021

P.T. ASHA. J,

mps

mps
O.P.No.59 of 2021
03.03.2021
(2/2)

¶34

4/4

¶35

http://www.judis.nic.in

Jagtar Singh Jandu, S/o.a.Labh Singh, v. M/s.Rishabh Infopark Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagtar Singh Jandu, S/o.a.Labh Singh, v. M/s.Rishabh Infopark Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Sri Thenandral Films Vs M/s. Thirupathi Brothers Film

S Magesh Vs Ps Ashok

S.Jamal Mohideen Vs K.T.J.Prakash

The Special Tahsildar (La), Vs Muthulakshmi

Mrs.S.Annapoorna Vs C.M.Dhinakaran and 2 Others

M/S.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. Vs Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jena