Allowed

The Special Tahsildar (La), v. Muthulakshmi

Madras HC3 Mar 2021CRP(MD)/1427/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The court modified the impugned judgment and decree dated 03/03/2009 by reducing the awarded compensation from Rs. 1700 to Rs. 1221 per unit, while confirming entitlement to other statutory benefits.

What did the court decide?

Compensation reduced from Rs. 1700/- to Rs. 1,221/- per unit; claimants entitled to solatium and interest; no costs.

The Special Tahsildar (La), Vs Muthulakshmi — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRP(MD). No.1427 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶4

Wednesday, the Third day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶7

CRP(MD). No.1427 of 2014

¶8

THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE UNIT-1 DINDIGUL.

¶9

... Petitioner/Respondent

¶10

¶11

MUTHULAKSHMI

¶12

CHANDRASEKARAN

¶13

RAJENDRAN ... Respondent/Appellants

¶14

Prayer :-

¶15

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Judgment and Decree dated 03/03/2009 made in L.A.C.M.A.NO.2 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul.

¶16

DECREE:-

¶17

This Civil Revision Petition coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the judgment and decree of the Lower Appellate Court and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. V.R. Shanmuganathan, Special Government Pleader for the Petitioner and of Mr. G. Aravinthan, Advocate for respondent 1 to 3, this court while allowing this Civil Revision Petition, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶18

that the compensation awarded be and hereby is reduced from Rs.1700/- per sq.ft. to Rs.1,221/- per (*)Cent .

¶19

that the claimants will be entitled to all other statutory benefits in terms of solatium and interest as per the provisions of the Act.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

CRP(MD). No.1427 of 2014

¶23

that there be no costs in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶26

(*) Corrected as per order of this Court dated 28.01.2022 made in CRP(MD).1427 of 2014

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶29

// True Copy //

¶30

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶31

¶32

(*) to be substituted the order already despatched on 30.03.2021 The Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.

¶33

Copy to:

¶34

The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai(2 copies)

¶35

+2 CCs to M/s.G.ARAVINTHAN, Advocate ( SR-8565 dated 03/03/2021 ) +1 CC to Mr. Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 2816

¶36

ORDER DATED : 03/03/2021

¶37

========================== DECREE ==========================

¶38

CRP(MD). No.1427 of 2014

¶39

Allowing the CRP(MD). No.1427 of 2014 preferred against judgment and decree passed by the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul made in L.A.C.M.A. NO.2 of 1999, dated 03/03/2009 etc., as stated within.

¶40

NA(CO)

¶41

TR(25.03.2021) 2P 6C TR(18.02.2021) 2P 7C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

2/2

The Special Tahsildar (La), v. Muthulakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Special Tahsildar (La), v. Muthulakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Sri Thenandral Films Vs M/s. Thirupathi Brothers Film

S Magesh Vs Ps Ashok

S.Jamal Mohideen Vs K.T.J.Prakash

Jagtar Singh Jandu, S/o.a.Labh Singh, Vs M/s.Rishabh Infopark Pvt. Ltd.

Mrs.S.Annapoorna Vs C.M.Dhinakaran and 2 Others

M/S.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. Vs Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jena