Dismissed

K.S.M.Raja v. C. Rajendran

Madras HC6 Dec 2021CRP(MD)/861/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a revision petition under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act challenging a rent control order, the court held that no such order survived after the landlord took possession via execution. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

K.S.M.Raja Vs C. Rajendran — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.861 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.861 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD) No.5707 of 2020 and Caveat No.1328 of 2020

¶4

K.S.M.Raja .. Petitioner/Appellant/ Respondent-Tenant

¶5

-vs-

¶6

1.C.Rajendran 2.C.Kumaresan

¶7

3.C.Rajapandian

¶8

4.C.Shanmugasundaram

¶9

5.C.Dhakshinamoorthy .. Respondents/Respondents Petitioners-Landlords

¶10

Prayer :- Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act to set aside the order passed in R.C.A.No.41 of 2019 dated 17.03.2020 by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Madurai by confirming the order passed in R.C.O.P.No.330 of 2013 dated 04.01.2019 on the file of the Principal Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Madurai Town.

¶11

For Petitioner : Ms.N.Juliet Latha For Respondents : Mr.M.Kannan

¶12

ORDER

¶13

It is informed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the Landlord has taken possession of the property through execution proceedings and nothing survives for consideration in this revision.

¶14

2.Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶17

// True Copy //

¶18

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.861 of 2020

¶22

abr

¶23

Note:-In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

¶24

¶25

1.The Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Madurai.

¶26

2.The Principal Rent Controller

¶27

(Principal District Munsif), Madurai Town.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.M.KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-37629[F] dated 07/12/2021 )

¶29

C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.861 of 2020 Dated: 06.12.2021

¶30

TSK(CO) KB(21.12.2021) 2P 4C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

K.S.M.Raja v. C. Rajendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.S.M.Raja v. C. Rajendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulthan, Vs Nagavalli

Ulagammal, Vs R.Madasamy

Nachiyar, Vs K.Jansi Rani

Minor.B.Anitha, Vs Vairamani

Arulraj Vs R.Joseph

Nagammal, Vs Guruvammal