Ulagammal, v. R.Madasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenged the order in an interim application allowing amendment of the plaint. The High Court allowed the petition being the order was a non-speaking order.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 06.03.2020 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.200 of 2016 was set aside and the matter was remitted to the court below within one month.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.250 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.250 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD) No.1488 of 2021
Ulagammal .. Petitioner/Respondent
-vs-
R.Madasamy .. Respondent
Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 06.03.2020 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.200 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 06.03.2020, passed in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.200 of 2016 by the learned I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli in and by which, the application filed by the respondent for amending the plaint was ordered.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a non-speaking order passed by the court below can be challenged by way of a civil revision.
Whether the Principles 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, apply to the disposal of the present petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ulagammal
- respondent
R.Madasamy
Coram
P.T. Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court