Arulraj v. R.Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
Madurai Bench revisited a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 challenging a fair and decretal order. After learning the underlying appeal had been disposed of post-filing the petition, the court held nothing survived, dismissing the petition as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.853 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.853 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD) No.5685 of 2020 and Caveat No.1213 of 2020
Arulraj .. Petitioner/Petitioner/3rd Party
-vs1.R.Joseph 2.R.Vethamuthu .. Respondents 1 & 2/Respondents 1 & 2/ Appellants 1 & 2 R.Arockiyasami (Died) .. 3rd Respondent/3rd Appellant 3.R.John Peter 4.Therasammal Santhi 5.Arulayee 6.Minor.Nisha 7.Minor.Asha .. Respondents 3 to 7/Respondents 4 to 8/ Appellants 4 to 8 [Minor Respondents 6 & 7 are represented by their mother and natural guardian, the 4th respondent]
Rayappan @ Rayar Udayar (Died) .. 9th Respondent/1st Respondent
8.Rajasekaran 9.A.Arockiyanathan 10.Paranjothi .. Respondents 8 to 10/ Respondents 10 to 12/Respondents 2 to 4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition survives for consideration given the disposal of the impugned appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arulraj
- respondent
R. Joseph
- respondent
R.Vethamuthu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court