Dismissed

Nachiyar, v. K.Jansi Rani

Madras HC3 Dec 2021CMP(MD)/2125/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge Bench dismissed the civil revision petition for default. The court had granted time to the petitioner to cure defaults in representation and filing of affidavit. Since the petitioner failed to comply within the stipulated period, the petition stood dismissed against the sole respondent.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed for default without representation of batta and required documents.

Nachiyar, Vs K.Jansi Rani — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CMP(MD). No.2125 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶5

CMP(MD). NO.2125 OF 2019 IN CRP(MD)SR.NO.2099 OF 2019

¶6

Nachiyar ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶7

¶8

K.Jansi Rani ... Respondent/Respondent

¶9

Prayer : - Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 643 days in filing the appeal and to pass such other further order or order as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case and thus render justice.

¶10

Prayer :-CRP(MD)SR. No.2099 of 2019

¶11

Civil Revision petition filed under section 115 of Civil Procedure code to set aside the order dated 02.02.2017 made in E.P.No.144/2014 on the file of 2^nd Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai and consequentially cancel the sale deed dated 19/09/2016 bearing document No.10798/2016 and pass such other further orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

¶12

ORDER :- This petition having been posted for orders on this day, for not having represented the batta with petition along with affidavit in the presence of Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh Advocate for the petitioner and this court having granted time Three Weeks from 03.12.2021 , for compliance of the defects, as condition precedent and the said Advocate, not having complied with the said direction of this Court, it is ordered that this Petition do stand dismissed against the sole respondent.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶15

// True Copy //

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶18

1/2

¶19

CMP(MD). No.2125 of 2019

¶20

¶21

The II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai.

¶22

Copy to:

¶23

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

¶24

ORDER DATED : 03/12/2021 ========================== Dismissed for Default ========================== CMP(MD). No.2125 of 2019 in CRP(MD)sr.No.2099 of 2019 Giving direction and etc. as stated within. (CO) GC(12.04.2022) 2P 3C

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

2/2

Nachiyar, v. K.Jansi Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nachiyar, v. K.Jansi Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murali, Vs Vedhamary

Rejendran, Vs Vijaya

Anto Vs St.Antonys Church

Sulthan, Vs Nagavalli

Ulagammal, Vs R.Madasamy

Meichel Ammal Vs Jesu Vadiyal