Dismissed

Meichel Ammal v. Jesu Vadiyal

Madras HC3 Dec 2021CMP(MD)/2423/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMJ dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking condonation of delay for filing a Civil Revision Petition (Section 115 CPC). The dismissal followed the petitioner's failure to comply with the court's earlier direction to cure procedural defects by 25/01/2022.

What did the court decide?

The petition for condonation of delay and set aside of judgment and decree dated 22.01.2018 stood dismissed.

Meichel Ammal Vs Jesu Vadiyal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶2

Friday, the Third day of December Two Thousand and Twenty One

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA

¶5

CMP(MD). No.2423 of 2019 IN CRP(MD)SR.NO.21001 of 2018

¶6

Meichel Ammal

¶7

Rajan @ Gnanaprakasam ... Petitioners/Petitioners

1 Jesu Vadiyal

2 Mariya Pushpam

3 Mariya Thangam

¶12

4 Mariya Looyi @ Ayyavu

¶13

5 John Britto

¶14

6 Sahaya Rosley

¶15

7 Jessy Phillips Dorlley

¶16

8 Jooliyet ... Respondent/Respondent

¶17

Prayer in CMP(MD). No.2423 of 2019 :-

¶18

Civil Miscellaneous petition filed Under Section 5 of limitation Act, to condone the delay of 35 days in filing the Civil Revision petition before this Honourable court and thus render jusice.

¶19

Prayer in CRP(MD)SR.NO.21001 of 2018:-

¶20

Civil Revision petition filed Under Section 115 of CPC. To set aside the judgment an ddecree dated 22.01.2018 made in CMA NO 7 OF 2011 on the file of the District Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, confirming the Judgment and decreetal order dated 13.10.2004 made in Probate O.P.No.8 of 1999 on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil, allow this Civil Revision Petition and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and this court having having granted time on or

¶22

before 25/01/2022, for compliance of the defects, as condition precedent and the said Advocate, not having complied with the said direction of this court, it is ordered that the petition do stand dismissed in respect of the Respondent 1 to 8.

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CS III)

¶24

¶25

The I Additional Sub Judge, Nagercoil

¶26

Copy to:

¶27

The Section Officer, Judicial Section,

¶28

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

¶29

ORDER DATED : 03/12/2021 ========================== ORDER ==========================

¶30

CMP(MD). No.2423 of 2019 in CRP(MD)SR.NO.21001 of 2018

¶31

Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶32

MGJ(08.04.2022) 2P 3C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Meichel Ammal v. Jesu Vadiyal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meichel Ammal v. Jesu Vadiyal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murali, Vs Vedhamary

Rejendran, Vs Vijaya

Anto Vs St.Antonys Church

Sulthan, Vs Nagavalli

Ulagammal, Vs R.Madasamy

Nachiyar, Vs K.Jansi Rani