Disposed

R.Velusamy v. State Rep by

Madras HC10 Mar 2021CRL OP/1087/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted an order for completion of police enquiry within four weeks without arrest for offences under IPC 420 and 506(i), directing the police to register FIR if a prima facie case exists or close the enquiry otherwise, under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Police directed to complete enquiry within four weeks without arrest; to register FIR if prima facie case exists or close enquiry otherwise.

R.Velusamy Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Tenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1087 of 2021

¶7

1 R.VELUSAMY [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 V.NANDHAKUMAR 3 S.SENTHIL KUMAR

¶8

Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, COIMBATORE DISTRICT. CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2021.

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S T.BALACHANDRAN Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : M/S. S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable u/s 420 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.Not Known of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶15

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry in Current Paper No.13 of 2021 is pending against the petitioners.

¶16

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the enquiry, if a prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report, otherwise close the petition enquiry. The respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioners till such https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ time.

¶17

This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly with the above directions.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

10/03/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,
COIMBATORE DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S T.BALACHANDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.1087/2021
Date :10/03/2021
MN-09/04/2021

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Velusamy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Velusamy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satheesh @ Satheesh Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.T.Basheer Ahmed Vs the State Rep by

Arivazhagan Vs State Rep by

R.Vini @ Vinithraj Vs State by

Karthick Vs the State Represented by

B.Sathish Kumar Vs State Rep by