The petitioner, the accused in a criminal case, sought anticipatory bail. The final order stated that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant's counsel.
The Criminal Original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Tenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20410 of 2020
B.SATHISH KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEERKANKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020
For Petitioner : M/S.S.YUDISH PADMAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.M.PRABHAVATHI, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
-sd/10/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEERKANKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.S.YUDISH PADMAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.20410/2020
Date :10/03/2021
cs 15/04/2021
B.SATHISH KUMAR
STATE
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
