Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner was already in judicial custody, rendering the apprehension of arrest untenable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.18994 of 2020
SATHEESH @ SATHEESH KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] ANNADHANAPATTY POLICE STATION, SALEM CITY, SALEM DISTRICT. CR.NO.1921 OF 2020
For Petitioner : M/S.B.VASUDEVAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.K.PRABAKAR Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420 of IPC and Section 7(1) and 7(3) of Lotteries Regulation Act, in Crime No.1921 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
-sd/-
09/03/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNADHANAPATTY POLICE STATION, SALEM CITY, SALEM DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.B.VASUDEVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.18994/2020
Date :09/03/2021
rvr 08/04/2021
SATHEESH @ SATHEESH KUMAR
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
