Karthick v. the State Represented by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions in a criminal matter; the court dismissed the petition because it had been withdrawn by the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Tenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.8534 of 2020
IN CRL OP.16138/2020
KARTHICK [ PETITIONER ] Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-12, POONAMALLEE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. CRIME NO.909 OF 2020.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on (b) that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders in Crl.O.P.No.16138 of 2020 dated 12.10.2020.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.VINOTH, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
2.Recording the above submission so made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
NO.II, POONAMALLEE.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
THIRUVALLUR. [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
T-12, POONAMALLEE POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
C.C. to M/S.M.VINOTH Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.8534/2020
in
CRL OP.16138/2020
Date :10/03/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
TA-23/04/2021
KARTHICK
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court