Disposed

Santhoshkumar v. State Rep.by

Madras HC4 Mar 2021CRL MP/2461/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition to extend time for compliance with a conditional Anticipatory Bail order. The High Court, after hearing both sides, granted two weeks to the petitioner from the date the order copy is made ready, with automatic dismissal of the bail petition if not complied with.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order dated 04.03.2020.

Santhoshkumar Vs State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fourth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2461 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.4534/2020

¶8

SANTHOSHKUMAR [PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED] Vs STATE REP.BY [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT] THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALASAPAKKAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CRIME.NO.66 OF 2020.

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time by two weeks in Crl.O.P.No.4534 of 2020 dated 04.03.2020 to comply with the condition of the Hon’ble Court.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.SATHISHKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶11

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to extend the time to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order dated 04.03.2020 made in Crl.O.P.No.4534 of 2020.

¶12

Heard both sides.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order passed by this Court, from the date on which the order copy made ready. Failing which, the petition for

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶16

-sd/04/03/2021

¶17

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶18

TRUE COPY

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
KALASAPAKKAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
TIRUVANNAMALAI [FOR INFORMATION].
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KALASAPAKKAM POLICE STATION,
TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
5 THE DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST,
TIRUVANNAMALAI.
+1 C.C. to M/S.A.SATHISHKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR.NO.2726.
Order
in
CRL MP.2461/2021
in
CRL OP.4534/2020
Date :04/03/2021

¶20

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶21

EP-16/03/2021

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Santhoshkumar v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhoshkumar v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajammal Vs the Inspector of Police

Madesh Vs State Rep by

Sabarinathan Vs Inspector of Police

Vellaisamy Vs State Rep. by

B.Anandan Vs the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police

Arumugam Vs the State of Tamil Nadu