Allowed

B.Anandan v. the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police

Madras HC4 Mar 2021CRL OP/21038/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under sections 420, 409, and 464 of IPC. The police were directed to complete the pending enquiry within four weeks without arresting the petitioner or registering an FIR unless a prima facie case was established.

What did the court decide?

Police directed to complete enquiry within four weeks without arresting the petitioner; arrest barred during this period.

B.Anandan Vs the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fourth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.21038 of 2020

¶7

B.ANANDAN ...PETITIONER Vs THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ...RESPONDENT CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH-II, GREATER CHENNAI POLICE, VEPERY, CHENNAI-600 007. CRIME.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020. For Petitioner : M/S.S.VINOD Advocate

¶8

For Respondent : M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN Additional Public Prosecutor

¶9

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶10

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 409 and 464 of IPC, in Crime No.not known on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶12

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry in Current Paper No.3/ADC-CCB-II/2020, dated 14.12.2020 is pending against the petitioner.

¶13

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report or close the petition enquiry. Till then, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioner.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed. -sd/04/03/2021

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into
execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH-II,
GREATER CHENNAI POLICE,
VEPERY, CHENNAI-600 007
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+2 CC to M/S.S.VINOD Advocate on payment of necessary charges
SR.NO.2813.
CRL OP.21038/2020
Date :04/03/2021
EP-11/03/2021

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Anandan v. the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Anandan v. the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajammal Vs the Inspector of Police

Madesh Vs State Rep by

Sabarinathan Vs Inspector of Police

Vellaisamy Vs State Rep. by

Arumugam Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

V.Gunasekaran Vs State Rep by