This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Fourth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19893 of 2020
ARUMUGAM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THROUGH [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THARAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.938 OF 2020
For Petitioner : M/S.DEEPAN UDAY Advocate
For Respondent : M.PRABHAVATHI Addl. Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THARAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.DEEPAN UDAY Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.19893/2020
Date :04/03/2021
MN-08/04/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ARUMUGAM
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THARAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
