Allowed

Madesh v. State Rep by

Madras HC3 Mar 2021CRL OP/883/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Madras High Court directed the respondent police to complete their pending enquiry within four weeks. The court granted interim relief prohibiting the arrest of the petitioner until the enquiry concludes, directing registration of an FIR only if a prima facie case is made out.

What did the court decide?

Order directed police to complete enquiry within four weeks and not arrest petitioner; anticipatory bail granted pending enquiry conclusion.

Madesh Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Third day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.883 of 2021

¶7

MADESH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, KRISHNAGIRI, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021)

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.A.ILAYA PERUMAL Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

For Intervenor : M/S V.AYYAPPA RAJA Advocate

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC, in Crime No.Not known of 2020, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police.

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner in C.S.R.No.182 of 2020.

¶18

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the enquiry, if a prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report, otherwise close the petition. Till then,

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
-sd/-
03/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL,
KRISHNAGIRI
CC to M/S.A.ILAYA PERUMAL Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.883/2021
Date :03/03/2021
rvr 08/04/2021

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Madesh v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madesh v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanagamuthu Vs State Rep by

Vasu Vs the State Rep by

M.Kannan Vs State, Rep. by

R.Muruganantham Vs the Inspector of Police

Silambarasan Vs the State

Shenthilkumar Vs State Rep by