Disposed

V.Ramalingam v. S.Rajeshwaran,the Managing Director

Madras HC1 Nov 2021CONT P(MD)/1190/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed regarding non-compliance with an order on disbursing gratuity and provident fund. Upon the respondents filing compliance proceedings, the court closed the petition. No substantive litigation outcome remains.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed as the impugned order had been complied with.

V.Ramalingam Vs S.Rajeshwaran,the Managing… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01.11.2021

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR Cont. P(MD) No.1190 of 2021 in

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.1376 of 2020

¶6

V.Ramalingam ...Petitioner/Petitioner

Vs.

1.Mr.S.Rajeshwaran,

Managing Director,

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., 23/2, Thoothukudi Road,

¶11

Kattabomman Nagar,

¶12

Tirunelveli District.

¶13

2.Mr.V.Saravanan,

¶14

General Manager,

¶15

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents/Contemnor

¶16

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.1376 of 2020 dated 24.01.2020.

¶17

Prayer in WP(MD). 1376/ 2020 :

¶18

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court Direct the respondents to disburse interest at the rate of 6 percent for retirement benefits Gratuity, Provident Fund and Leave Salary.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajamohan, Standing Counsel.

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1376 of 2020 dated 24.01.2020.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.When this Contempt Petition is taken up for consideration, the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents would

¶23

¶24

submit that the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1376 of 2020 dated 24.01.2020 has been complied with and he has also produced the proceedings dated 04.09.2021 to that effect, before this Court.

¶25

3.Recording the said submission of the learned Standing counsel for the respondents, since the order passed in the writ petition has been complied with by the respondents, nothing survives for adjudication in this Contempt Petition.

¶26

4.Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed.

¶27

Assistant Registrar (CS III)

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶30

¶31

¶32

1.Mr.S.Rajeshwaran, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., 23/2, Thoothukudi Road, Kattabomman Nagar, Tirunelveli District.

¶33

2.Mr.V.Saravanan, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli District.

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.R.RAJAMOHAN, Advocate (SR-33437[F] dated 01/11/2021)

¶35

Cont. P(MD) No.1190 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.1376 of 2020 01.11.2021

¶36

NA(CO) SB(30.11.2021) 2P 4C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Ramalingam v. S.Rajeshwaran,the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Ramalingam v. S.Rajeshwaran,the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Amutha, Vs M.a.Murugesan, The Managing Director

M/S.T.Muthusamy Vs M.a.Murugesan

T. Pandiyan Vs Murugesan

Mohan Raj.a Vs the Member Secretary

V.Ramalingam Vs S.Rajeshwaran,the Managing Director

K.Moni Vs S.Rajeswaran