T. Pandiyan v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a short order in a contempt petition alleging disobedience of a 2020 writ judgment regarding payment of service surrender leave salary. The High Court held that the respondents had submitted compliance proof, thus dismissing the allegation. No substantive law was applied as the matter stood closed without adjudication.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29.10.2021
Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR Cont. P(MD) No.76 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.676 of 2020
T.Pandiyan
...Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.Murugesan, Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Madurai Division,
Bye Pass road, Madurai – 625 016.
2.Mr.Ganesan, General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Madurai Division, Dindigul Region, Dindigul-626 001. ...Contemnors/Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.676 of 2020 dated 10.01.2020.
Prayer in WP(MD). 676/ 2020 :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition survives adjudication once the underlying order of the writ petition is found to be complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Pandiyan
- respondent
Mr.Murugesan
- respondent
Mr.Ganesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court