Allowed

Association of Heads of High v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC22 Dec 2020WP/36989/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed writ petitions filed to quash Government Order Ms.No.180 dated 19.09.2005. The Court held that Secondary Grade Teachers and B.T. Assistants, not P.G. Assistants, are competent to handle students below 14 years under the Right to Education scheme due to lack of psychology training for the latter. The impugned order was set aside.

What did the court decide?

G.O.Ms.No.180 dated 19.09.2005 set aside; Respondents directed to appoint Secondary Grade Teachers and B.T. Assistant Teachers only.

Association of Heads of High Vs the Secretary to… — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

W.P.Nos. 36989 of 2005 & 11077 of 2006

¶6

Association of Heads of High and Higher Secondary Schools of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its General Secretary, 61, G2, Rajaram Street, Jawahar Nagar, Thirumangalam, Madurai District, Pin – 625 706.

¶7

...Petitioner in W.P.No.36989 of 2005 Tamilnadu Graduate Teachers' Association, (Regd.No.17 of 1975), Represented by its General Secretary Mr.S.M.Thambithurai, No.18, Padmanabhan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ...Petitioner in W.P.No.11077 of 2006 Versus 1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

¶8

3.The State Project Director, (S.S.A.Scheme), DPI Campus, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 4.The Tamil Nadu Post Graduate Teachers Association No.4, Dr.Radhakrishnan Nagar, Abdulla Street, Choolamedu, Chennai – 94, represented by its State Legal Secretary S.Arunagiri.

¶9

(R4 impleaded as per order dated 02.08.2006 by MTJ in WPMP No.4731 of 2006 in W.P.No.36989 of 2005).

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

5.Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Post Graduate Teacher's Association rep by its President having its office at No.124/35,

¶12

Bells Road, Triplicane, Madras -5.

¶13

(R5 impleaded as per order dated 27.10.2006 by PJMJ in WPMP No.17259 of 2006 in W.P.No.36989 of 2005).

¶14

... Respondents in W.P.No.36989 of 2005

¶15

1.State of Tamilnadu represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶16

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

¶17

3.The Tamil Nadu Post Graduate Teachers Association, No.4, Dr.Radhakrishnan Nagar, Abdulla Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai – 600 094, Rep.by its State Legal Secretary S.Arunagiri

¶18

(R3 impleaded as per order dated 25.08.2006 by CNJ in WPMP No.17466 of 2006 in W.P.No.11077 of 2006).

¶19

... Respondents in W.P.No.11077 of 2006

¶20

PRAYER IN BOTH WPs: Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1^st respondent in his proceedings in G.O.Ms.No.180 School Education(C2)) Department, dated 19.09.2005 and quash the order passed therein.

¶21

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Raja

¶22

Government Advocate for R1

¶23

Mr.J.Selvarajan for R2

¶24

..in W.P.No.36989/2005

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.P.Raja

¶26

Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.J.Selvarajan for R3 ..in W.P.No.11077/2005

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶29

These Writ Petitions have been filed calling for the records of the 1^st respondent in his proceedings in G.O.Ms.No.180 School Education Department, dated 19.09.2005 and quash the order passed therein.

¶30

However, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that after compulsory education has come into force in order to avoid the drop out of the students, the scheme has been established and the students below 14 years, have been given the right to education and therefore, teachers who are working as Secondary Grade as well as B.T.Assistant, alone, can be appointed in that post and not the Post Graduate Assistant. Since they have not undergone study in psychology subject, they cannot deal with the students below 14 years and therefore, P.G.Assistant cannot be appointed in the said post. He further stated that compulsory free education up to 14 years has to be given by the State to avoid the drop out and to promote free education. They have created post of Block Resource Teacher Educators and Resource Teacher Educator at the Block / District /State level for effective implementation of the scheme of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan.

¶31

As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, since students below 14 years covered under the scheme of right to free education, therefore, Secondary Grade Teachers and B.T.Assistants are only competent persons to deal with those students but Post Graduate Assistants are not competent persons to deal with the students below 14 years age group. Therefore, G.O.Ms.No.180 of School Education is set aside and writ petition is allowed.

¶32

The respondents are directed to appoint the Secondary Grade Teachers and B.T.Assistant Teachers only and not the Post Graduate Assistant.

¶33

With the above direction, these writ petitions are allowed. No costs.

¶34

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶35

//True Copy//

¶36

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶37

Pns

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

¶40

1.The Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director of School Education,
College Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 006.
3.The State Project Director,
(S.S.A.Scheme),
DPI Campus,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.
4.The Tamil Nadu Post Graduate Teachers Association
No.4, Dr.Radhakrishnan Nagar, Abdulla Street, Choolamedu,
Chennai – 94, represented by its State Legal Secretary
S.Arunagiri.
5.Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Post Graduate
Teacher's Association rep by its President having its office
at No.124/35,Bells Road, Triplicane, Madras -5.
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 43010
W.P.Nos. 36989 of 2005 & 11077 of 2006
A.SK(21.01.2021)

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Association of Heads of High v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Association of Heads of High v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Pachiammal Vs the Block Development Officer

K.Babu Vs D.Chandrasekaran

G. Devaraj Vs D. Chandrsekaran

David Baskara Doss Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

K. Ramamoorthy Vs D. Chandrasekaran

R.Chinnadurai Vs Albert Dinakaran