David Baskara Doss v. the Government of Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court modified an earlier order dated 24.11.2020 which had reinstated the petitioner in service without back wages. The Court approved a joint memo of compromise entered between the parties and incorporated it into the order of the writ miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
The order of 24.11.2020 was modified to reflect the terms of the joint memo of compromise filed by the parties.
What the court decided
W.M.P.No.24661 of 2020
P.VELMURUGAN,J
The petitioner has filed this writ miscellaneous petition to modify the order dated 24.11.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8247 of 2007 in terms of joint Memo of Compromise entered between parties, which enclosed along with this affidavit.
- This Court allowed the writ petition on 24.11.2020 and also directed to
reinstate the petitioner in service and to pass an order permitting the petitioner to
retire from service with all consequential service and monetary benefits, but without back wages. The said exercise shall be completed within four weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order.
- Now, both the parties have arrived at settlement and they have filed a
Joint Memo of Compromise. The order passed by this Court dated 24.11.2020 is modified in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise and the Joint Memo of Compromise shall be form part of order of this writ petition.
- Accordingly, this writ miscellaneous petition is ordered.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 24.11.2020 restoring the petitioner to service with benefits but without back wages should be modified in light of a subsequent joint compromise.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
P.Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court