G. Devaraj v. D. Chandrsekaran
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-paragraph contempt order in Madras HC where the petition was closed due to non-service of notice and return of repeated notices for insufficient address, permitting a fresh filed after address discovery.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed; the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh petition upon finding the respondent's address.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.760 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Cont.P.No.760 of 2016
G.Devaraj, No.23, Harikrishna Bhattacharya Street, Thiruvyarpadi, Ponneri ... Petitioner
Versus
D.Chandrasekaran, Director, Sulochana Bevarages Pvt Ltd., No.65, Periyapalayam Road, Alinjiwakkam, Sozhawaram Post, Chennai – 600 067. ... Respondent PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying to punish the respondent for having violated and willfully disobeyed the order dated 10.12.2014 passed in W.P.M.P.No.559 of 2008 in W.P.No.13491 of 2006.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Elango For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Devaraj
- respondent
D. Chandrasekaran
Coram
P. Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court