K. Ramamoorthy v. D. Chandrasekaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt petition filed for violation of an earlier order due to non-service of notice resulting from insufficient address of the respondent, allowing a fresh petition upon correct address.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.759 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Cont.P.No.759 of 2016
K.Ramamoorthy, Azhinjivakkam Village, Sozhavaram Post, Chennai 600 067 ... Petitioner
Versus
D.Chandrasekaran, Director, Sulochana Bevarages Pvt Ltd., No.65, Periyapalayam Road, Alinjiwakkam, Sozhawaram Post, Chennai – 600 067. ... Respondent PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying to punish the respondent for having violated and willfully disobeyed the order dated 10.12.2014 passed in W.P.M.P.No.557 of 2008 in W.P.No.13489 of 2006.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Elango For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Ramamoorthy
- respondent
D.Chandrasekaran
Coram
P.Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court