The High Court of Madras filed to dismiss a writ petition seeking the return of a release deed as infructuous after the document had already been filed and returned to the petitioner.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 19.08.2020
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.27949 of 2014
Saroja ... Petitioner
.vs.
The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registration, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to return the release deed dated 05.08.2014 vide document No.6615/2014 on the file fo the respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr. S. Arivazhagan
For Respondent : Mr .P.P. Purushothaman, Govt. Advocate
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to return the release deed dated 05.08.2014 vide document No.6615/2014.
2.When the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent had already registered the document and the same was also returned to the petitioner on 09.12.2014.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registration, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.No.27392
W.P.No.27949 of 2014
ajs (so) rr ii (09/09/2020)
Saroja
The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registration, Gudiyatham, Vellore District
M. Duraismamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
