The High Court at Madras dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous because the District Revenue Officer had already considered the petitioner's representation and passed an order by 19.09.2014.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.08.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.25730 of 2014 and M.P. No.1 of 2014
Ramu ...Petitioner
v.
1.The State Represented by
The District Collector,
Cuddalore District,
Cuddalore.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Cuddalore District,
Cuddalore.
3.Savithiri
4.Dhanalakshmi
5.Subha
6.Bhuvaneswari
(R3 to R6 impleaded as per court order dated
19.08.2020 in M.P.No.2 of 2014 in W.P
No.25730/2014) ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents
1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated
02.09.2014 in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr. M. Velmurugan
For Respondents : Ms. A. Mathumathi,
Special Govt. Pleader - for R1 & R2
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.09.2014 in accordance with law.
Mrs. R. Hemalatha for Mr. C. Prakasam - for R3 to R6 (Impleaded vide order dated 19.8.2020)
O R D E R
It is brought to the notice of this court by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 6 that the District Revenue Officer has already considered the petitioner's representation dated 02.09.2014 and passed an order on 19.09.2014, hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To 1.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.27400
W.P.No.25730 of 2014 and M.P. No.1 of 2014
SVI(CO) KKV/28/08/2020
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging non-consideration of the petitioner's representation remained subsiding after the authority passed an order on the matter.
Ramu
The State Represented by The District Collector, Cuddalore District
The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore District
Savithiri
Dhanalakshmi
Subha
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
