The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition seeking mandatory directions to return a registered sale deed, ruling the matter infructuous as the document had already been returned to the respondent with all charges paid.
No relief granted; writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 19.08.2020
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.19519 of 2012
.vs.
The Sub Registrar, Gandhipuram Sub Registrar Office, Sanganoor Main Road, Coimbatore – 641 027. ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to return the sale deed of the petitioner dated 10.03.2005 in Ref No.P6/2005 with proper registration forthwith.
For Petitioners : Mr. V. Gopalakrishnan
For Respondent : Mr .P.P. Purushothaman, Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to return the sale deed of the petitioner dated 10.03.2005 in Ref No.P6/2005 with proper registration forthwith.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Sub Registrar, Gandhipuram Sub Registrar Office, Sanganoor Main Road, Coimbatore – 641 027.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.No.27391
W.P.No.19519 of 2012
ajs (so) rr ii (09/09/2020)
R. Prabakaran
P. Rajalakshmi
The Sub Registrar, Gandhipuram Sub Registrar Office
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
