Disposed

Mrs.a.Meenakshi, v. the District Collector

Madras HC19 Aug 2020WP/25511/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order in a writ petition seeking a mandate to issue a patta. The Court directed the 3rd respondent to consider the pending representation and pass an order on merits within 12 days, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case. The connected MP was closed.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 24.08.2013 and pass an order on merits within 12 days.

Mrs.a.Meenakshi, Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.08.2020 CORAM : The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.25511 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶2

Mrs. A. Meenakshi

¶3

Mrs. A. Parvathi

¶4

... petitioners

¶5

¶6

The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

¶7

The Revenue Divisional fficer, Ambattur Division, Thiruvallur District.

¶8

The Tahsildhar, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶9

The President, Pothur Village Panchayath, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to issue a patta to the petitioners in respect of the lands in Survey No.244, measuring to an extent of 80 cents out of 1.08 acres situated in Pothur Village, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶12

For petitioners : Mr. J. Bharathi Raja For Respondents : Ms. A. Mathumathi, Special Govt. Pleader

¶13

Page 1/3

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to issue a patta to the petitioners in respect of the land in Survey No.244, measuring an extent of 80 cents out of 1.08 acres situated in Pothur Village, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶17

Mr. J. Bharathi Raja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have given a representation dated 24.08.2013 to the 3^rd respondent for the issuance of patta, however, the 3^rd respondent has not passed any order sofar.

¶18

Ms. A. Mathumathi, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents respondent submitted that the 3^rd respondent may be directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.

¶19

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioners, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3^rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.08.2013 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

-s/d-

¶22

Assistant Registrar

¶23

True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

¶26

The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

¶27

Page 2/3

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

The Revenue Divisional fficer, Ambattur Division, Thiruvallur District.

¶30

The Tahsildhar, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶31

The President, Pothur Village Panchayath, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶32

W.P.No.25511 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶33

ssv(co) aa30/09/2020

¶34

Page 3/3

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.a.Meenakshi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.a.Meenakshi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Subramani, Vs the Executive Engineer / Urban

Tmt.Jothy Vs the District Collector

V.L.Dhandapani Vs the Director of Town

Saroja, W/o.Raja Achary, Vs The Sub Registrar

Ramu, Vs The State, rep. by the

S.Rajasekaran Vs Corporation of Chennai