R.Purushothaman v. K.L.Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of a Civil Revision Petition summarily as 'settled out of Court' without recording arguments or delivering a substantive order under Section 115 CPC.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of revision petition as settled out of court.
What the court decided
CRP.(NPD).No.2648 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(NPD).No.2648 of 2013
and
MP.No.1 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2014
1.R.Purushothaman
2.Sateesh Kumar ... Petitioners
Versus
K.L.Jain ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the above said order passed in the above said I.A.SR.No.26673 of 2013 in O.S.No.5271 of 2005, dated 19.02.2013 on the file of the learned VI Additional, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For petitioners : Mr.K.V.Subramanian Association For Respondent : Mr.K.Bijai Sundar
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Purushothaman
- petitioner
Sateesh Kumar
- respondent
K.L. Jain
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court