Revision Petition under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed as abated because the sole respondent died without legal heirs being brought on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP.(NPD).No.2585 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 06.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(NPD).No.2585 of 2010
Sakina F.Laila ... Petitioner Versus K.P.Ramesh Babu ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1993 & Act 1 of 1980, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 19.01.2007 passed by the VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in R.C.A.No.300 of 1999 as reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 05.02.1999 passed by the X Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCOP.No.1752 of 1991.
For petitioner : Ms.T.Velumani For Respondent : Died
ORDER
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the
sole respondent died, but till date, no steps have been taken to bring the legal heirs on record. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated with liberty to move appropriate application, if the legal heirs of the petitioner warrants so to do. No costs.
06.02.2020
Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking/Non-Speaking order klt
1 of 2
CRP.(NPD).No.2585 of 2010
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
klt
To
CRP.(NPD).No.2585 of 2010
06.02.2020
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sakina F.Laila
K.P.Ramesh Babu
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
