Bhuvaneswari v. v.Murali Sundaram
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution for default because the petitioners failed to appear despite notice being served.
What did the court decide?
No costs
What the court decided
CRP(PD).No.2208 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(PD).No.2208 of 2013
1.Bhuvaneswari
2.M.Hemavathy@Thamarai ... Petitioners
Versus
V.Murali Sundaram ... Respondent
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 Constitution of India, to direct the II Additional Family Court at Chennai to dispose the I.A.No.372 of 2012 in O.P.No.3341 of 2011.
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondent : No appearance
1/2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition should be dismissed for default when petitioners fail to appear.
Effect of non-appearance on the disposal of a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhuvaneswari
- petitioner
M.Hemavathy@Thamarai
- respondent
V.Murali Sundaram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court