The High Court at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 83(9) of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Act as infructuous, noting that the petitioners had already endorsed the prayer as such. The petitioners were A.Samsudeen and Mohameed Yusuf challenging a decree by the Wakf Tribunal.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP.(NPD).No.1802 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(NPD).No.1802 of 2011
1.A.Samsudeen
2.Mohameed Yusuf ...Petitioners/Defendants
Vs.
Haji Abdul Azeez ...Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 83(9) of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Act, to set aside the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge (Wakf Tribunal) of Cuddalore, passed in the Counter claim filed in O.S.No.58 of 2007, dated 19.08.2010.
For Petitioners : Mr.D.Baskar
For Respondent : Mr.S.K.Raghunathan
O R D E R
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submit
that the prayer in the Civil Revision Petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.
1/2
CRP.(NPD).No.1802 of 2011
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN., J. dua
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
05.02.2020
dua
Speaking Order:Yes/No
To
The Principal Subordinate Judge (Wakf Tribunal),
Cuddalore.
CRP.(NPD).No.1802 of 2011
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Samsudeen
Mohameed Yusuf
Haji Abdul Azeez
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
