Yesothai v. Krishnamurthy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC for default due to the petitioner's absence when the matter was called. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
CRP.(NPD).No.2325 of 2014 and MP.No.1 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(NPD).No.2325 of 2014
and
MP.No.1 of 2014
1.Yesothai
2.Chinnapappa
3.Thenmozhi
4.Valarmathi
5.Ambika ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.Krishnamurthy
2.Jayalakshmi
3.Saroja ...Respondents
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 16.12.2013, made in E.P.No.89 of 2011 in O.S.No.2 of 1995, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Ulundurpet.
For Petitioners : No appearance For R1 : Mr.M.Ashwin Kumar for M/s.Sarvabhauman & Associates
1/2
CRP.(NPD).No.2325 of 2014 and MP.No.1 of 2014
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Yesothai
- petitioner
Chinnapappa
Coram
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court